• 1

Error code?

(Anonymous)
Why not patch the kernel to return a different errno value? Ideally one would add a new one like say EALLOW but also one could just use EBADTYPE or ENOTSUPP or EBADF or the ultimate in Unix tradition, ENOTTY =P. At least then the user would get a different error if it was DAC or MAC preventing them (ie "Operation not permitted" vs "Permission denied").

Interesting solution.

When I commented out that check, then I get a different error in the same module about krb_time_to_life (sic).

When I commented out that check, then I get a different error in the same module about krb_time_to_life (sic).

When I commented out that check, then I get a different error in the same module about krb_time_to_life (sic).

  • 1
?

Log in